RBC agrees to US$3.9 million settlement for share-class failures

Aside from omitting material information concerning its compensation when recommending the more expensive share classes, RBC failed to explain that the customers’ overall investment returns would be negatively impacted by their purchases of the more expensive shares.

The SEC order noted that during the relevant period, RBC did not have adequate systems and controls to ascertain which retirement plans and charitable account customers were qualified to avail of load-waived Class A or Class R shares. All in all, RBC was found to have fallen short in at least 16,475 transactions across an estimated 2,391 accounts of eligible customers.

“Eligible Customers paid a total of $2,607,676 in up-front sales charges, CDSCs, and higher ongoing fees and expenses from purchases of mutual fund share classes,” the SEC said.

RBC Wealth Management, RBC’s broker-dealer and RIA division, neither admitted nor denied the charges.

In a statement Monday, the firm said it “fully cooperated” with the SEC’s review of its mutual fund sales.



OTTAWA'S RETIREMENT PLANNING BLOG If you have questions about retirement or financial planning then take a look here. Tons of articles & information on Canadian financial planning topics such as life insurance, investing and more.There are still a lot of misconceptions about money & retirement planning. I just want to help you retire when you want and how you want. As a Registered Retirement Consultant-RRC® and independent adviser, I share my unbiased knowledge to help you have a better understanding of investing, insurance and financial planning.Getting on track for retirement doesn't have to be confusing or complicated. Get the information you need to avoid mistakes and be Ready For Retirement!